Application Layer
EBS Runs Your Business Tonight. Fusion Might Run It Tomorrow. We Cover Both
One Partner Who Has Worked Both Sides of This Estate
We know the system you are leaving
Assessment retrieves every customization from the environment, at both the database and operating system layer, so the inventory is generated rather than remembered.
We extract the custom code
Assessment retrieves every customization from the environment, at both the database and operating system layer, so the inventory is generated rather than remembered, whichever platform it lives on.
SOX changes identified automatically
Changes to menus, functions, and responsibilities across two instances are identified with tooling rather than manual comparison, which is what removes the post-configuration validation bottleneck.
Integration is designed, not discovered
Whichever system sits at the center, it has to talk to everything else in the estate. We map those interfaces during design rather than finding them during user acceptance testing.
Change management is in scope
Process automation, workflow execution, and roles all shift when you upgrade or migrate. We plan for that alongside the build, because a technically correct go-live that nobody adopts has still failed.
Reusable assets, not blank pages
Delta training, test cases categorized by module and type, and battle-tested automation practices carry from engagement to engagement, so your program starts from something rather than nothing.
Advise
Advisory
Build
Implementation
Migrate
Migration
Run
Managed Services
Extend
Custom Development
Optimize
FinOps
What we deliver across the EBS estate
Upgrade
-
Current-state & code assessment
-
SOX & role changes
-
Impact analysis
-
Training & test assets
-
Automated testing
-
Cutover & rollback
Re-platform
-
EBS on OCI
-
Exadata & Cloud@Customer
-
EBS on Azure, AWS & GCP
-
Data center migration
-
HA/DR design
-
Performance optimization
Extend
-
EBS customizations
-
SOA & API integration
-
Reporting & BI
-
RPA automation
-
Mobile extensions
-
Interface remediation
Sustain
-
Functional, technical & DBA support
-
L1-L3 support
-
Patching & maintenance
-
RCA & knowledge base
-
Break-fix support
-
Continuous improvement
What we deliver across the Fusion suite
Implementation
-
Fit-gap analysis
-
Enterprise structure design
-
Configuration & testing
-
Data migration
-
UAT & cutover
-
Hypercare support
Modules
-
ERP & Financials
-
HCM
-
SCM & Manufacturing
-
EPM
-
Customer Experience
-
Industry modules
Extend
-
PaaS extensions
-
Reports & analytics
-
Workflows & approvals
-
Third-party integrations
-
Mobile experiences
-
Upgrade-safe personalization
Sustain
-
Update readiness
-
Managed services
-
Process improvement
-
Adoption monitoring
-
Release roadmap alignment
-
Cost & license reviews
The honest version
EBS to Fusion Is a Decision, Not a Deadline
The default advice in this market is to migrate, because migration is the larger engagement. That advice is often wrong. EBS estates with deep customization serving a stable process can be the right answer for years, particularly where the Fusion equivalent would mean re-engineering a process that works.
The two are also architecturally different. EBS is forms and a database-centric model. Fusion is service-oriented, with orchestration assembling functionality across services. That difference is why a straight port does not exist and why lift and shift is the wrong frame. What is never right is deferring the decision by default. We run the assessment, model the options including staying, and let the numbers argue.
What the assessment covers
- Custom code inventory extracted at database and OS level
- Module-by-module fit against Fusion standard functionality
- Integration interface mapping across the estate
- Data quality and migration complexity by domain
- Phasing options with cost and disruption modeled, including a hybrid path
The answer is sometimes not yet, and we will say so
How an EBS program runs here
Assess
Custom code extraction, SOX change identification, module impact analysis, and an options model with cost and disruption per path.
Prepare
Environment build, delta training materials, test case libraries by module and type, and automation configured against your instance.
Execute
Iterative test cycles, defect resolution, cutover rehearsal, and a rollback position maintained throughout.
Sustain
Hypercare, then managed services under defined service levels with an L1 to L3 escalation framework.
Common starting points
Financials first
Chart of accounts redesign and financial close acceleration, typically the first module and the one that sets the enterprise structure everything else inherits.
HCM and workforce
Unified data model across every HR process, and the migration path off legacy HCM platforms including Workday and PeopleSoft.
SCM and manufacturing
Supply chain planning, procurement, and manufacturing where the constraint is visibility across plants rather than transaction processing.
Find out what your Oracle applications estate actually needs
What you walk away with
-
Complete custom code inventory, generated not estimated
-
SOX, menu, function, and responsibility change analysis
-
Fit-gap analysis against Fusion standard functionality
-
Integration interface map across the estate
-
Options model covering upgrade, re-platform, migrate, and hybrid
-
Cost, disruption, and risk per option
-
Recommended path with a committable schedule
[email protected] · infolob.com




